Web3 Breakdowns Ep 84 - Jack Neureuter - Bitcoin, Ethereum, and an Institutional Perspective
Primer: How do large institutions view Bitcoin and Ethereum? What does Bitcoin’s on-chain data show? Where does crypto belong in a diversified portfolio? Let’s find out from Jack Neureuter of Fidelity Digital Assets in this episode of Web3 Breakdowns.
Background
Senior research analyst at Fidelity Digital Assets
The Bitcoin Cycle
Everyone in the crypto space is familiar with the Bitcoin halving schedule — every 4 years, its issuance rate gets cut in half
The price of Bitcoin has moved in roughly 4-year cycles, 6 - 18 months after the halving
There’s a large run-up in prices followed by extreme drawdowns
Everyone is asking whether the same cycle is playing out
What gives him pause is the positive real interest rates on a forward-looking basis
This year is going to continue consolidating and be boring with no narratives
Is There A Catalyst Triggering Price Moves In Previous Cycles?
People who subscribe to these price runs would say that there is less Bitcoin being issued and, as a result, an imbalance between supply and demand
The marginal changes at each halving are a lot smaller
Hence, it’s a little more narrative this time around rather than in terms of material impact on miners’ bottom lines
Might head into a slowdown at the end of the year, with liquidity being added and central bank balance sheet expanding next year
His On-Chain Data Analysis Reports
Bitcoin and Ethereum are structurally different with core trade-offs and drivers
Bitcoin makes explicit trade-offs toward security and decentralization, at the cost of scalability and complexity
“What are the key KPIs that matter to a monetary asset that's trying to be an alternative store of value, digital gold? I would think it's people accumulating that asset and wanting to hold on to it.”
- Jack Neureuter
Bitcoin
When we look at accumulation addresses (addresses that have 2 or more inputs and 0 historical outputs), these addresses are breaking new all-time highs
There’s a million+ addresses having this type of activity
If we look at the liquid vs illiquid supply, 70% of the Bitcoin supply is illiquid (has not moved in the past 365 days or more). This is at an all-time high
There’s also cyclical behaviour — people taking profit when the price rises and less on-chain liquidity during drawdowns
There’s a group of Bitcoin accumulators that appear to be exhibiting Gresham’s Law type of behaviour on-chain
Gresham’s Law: Viewing Bitcoin as the better monetary asset by buying and holding it and viewing fiat money as a worse version of money
Ethereum
After Proof-of-Stake, Ethereum became a yield-bearing asset whose value or tokenomics is derived from useful applications that people are willing to pay to use
Those fees trickle down as value accrual for people who choose to stake their ETH or even just hold ETH since a portion of those fees are burnt
Big Money Buying Ethereum VS Bitcoin’s Decentralization
They are fundamentally different
Bitcoin’s use of Proof-of-Work is to abstract away the correlation between wealth and power
There’s an argument about buying more ASICs to mine Bitcoin. However, the actual energy supply and token wealth are two different currencies in theory
Bitcoin node operators are able to serve as a counterbalance against mining entities
In contrast, Ethereum node operators are themselves both the staker and the validator, combining their power into one
The Ability To Scale Bitcoin Relative To Ethereum
Most people talk about the Lightning Network that makes peer-to-peer payments cheaper
There are issues of liquidity fragmentation where channels have to be pre-funded
If you want to truly use it in a peer-to-peer fashion, then you should run your own node
However, this is not how most people use the Lightning Network. Instead, they use a custodial solution
On Bitcoin Ordinals
“That's one of the things about Bitcoin is it's always just been unwilling to change.”
- Jack Neureuter
Ordinals are one of the roundabout things that got invented because of inscriptions
Ordinals felt like a mini-bubble
Making small upgrades on the chain has been the framework for a lot of Bitcoin’s growth:
SegWit increased transaction malleability
Taproot led to people minting Ordinals
His View On A Bitcoin ETF In 2023
The wildcard is what comes out of the Grayscale lawsuit
Seems that the ball is moving forward with surveillance-sharing agreements
Crypto Merging With Traditional Finance
It is inevitable from an investment perspective
This is why Fidelity Digital Assets got involved in the space
There are security and custody risks associated with large institutions owning crypto
However, just because one large entity owns Bitcoin does not mean that they have more governance or voting rights over the network
In contrast, if there was a spot ETH ETF in the future, and those assets are staked, then there is a governance component to those tokens
Institutions Reaction: BTC/ETH Are Not Securities
The ruling and the outcome took a lot of people by surprise
Have not seen a response from institutions changing their allocation based on one specific court ruling
“It's a positive sign to see, especially that judges and lawyers are able and willing to wrap their head around the complexity of this space rather than just shove it into a singular mould of existing securities that we already have.”
- Jack Neureuter
Role Of Bitcoin In Client’sPortfolio
Bitcoin’s price action in the previous month tends to form the current narrative that allocators have
It’s a form of recency bias
In 2022, Bitcoin was correlated to the S&P and risk assets. The narrative during that period was that Bitcoin was similar to leveraged equity exposure
The narrative depends on the investor type
Those who look at things from a macro perspective want to own a bit of Bitcoin because it is a digital scarce asset
Ethereum is more for the tech-minded investor
Institutional Investor Survey
They conduct an institutional investor survey each year. The highest rates of adoption tend to be registered investment advisors and family offices that are directly connected to the end client
Often, it’s the end client that says that they want to get exposure to the digital asset space, with Fidelity or other companies helping them to get that exposure
Conversations with the end client tend to be on education
Allocations from large institutions are sparse. Often, they will go through a traditional venture wrapper rather than take direct token exposure
US VS International Adoption
Every single year, it goes from east to west in terms of rates of adoption, understanding, interests in DeFi, and yield opportunities
Asia is always the furthest up the curve, followed by Europe, with the US in the last spot across 90% of the categories each year
In Asia, the concept of a multi-currency world is more normal
Asia is also the first to digital payments, where it has become more normalized
Portfolio Weight Theory: Crypto In A Diversified Portfolio
Have written a number of different pieces using historical data
Even with historical data, it is hard because the dataset is small and everyone knows the returns were incredible before
Need to have a framework and investment thesis for the future
This is why a lot of people end up saying 1-3% because if it blows up, it will be only a small percentage of your portfolio
If it goes 10x, it would contribute meaningfully to your portfolio
Allocators that make these decisions tend to use mean-variance optimization, which Bitcoin does not fit perfectly inside
The Lack Of A Valuation System: A Severe Disadvantage
If you think of Bitcoin as a monetary asset, you would view it in terms of its value accrual
Ethereum could be viewed as a business that sells block space:
It has cash flows that come from fees being paid
It has an automated share buyback through the burn portion of those fees
They are going to release an ETH investment piece using a discounted cash flow model with tons of assumptions
To get a valuation perspective, you need to have an outlook on it or have a multiple associated with its current cash flow or revenue
With Bitcoin, it looks more like gold. Hence, it should have a relationship to some other macro variables
Have written a piece called Valuing Bitcoin
Areas Of Interest
The introduction of real-world assets on-chain
Need more regulatory clarity to bring assets on-chain
Scaling Ethereum from millions to billions of people across the globe
Most Excited To See
Over The Next 6 Months
Ethereum pushing through EIP-4844
Over The Next 6 Years
Real-world assets finding their way on-chain
Real-world use cases being enabled
Getting regulatory clarity
All information presented above is for educational purposes only and should not be taken as investment advice. Summaries are prepared by The Reading Ape. While reasonable efforts are made to provide accurate content, any errors in interpreting and summarizing the source material are ours alone. We disclaim any liability associated with the use of our content.